A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between possible neighbours about the development of a wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide interest adhering to an Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed household dwelling at Sutton Strand, where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental problems, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled into the courts. The Irish Times report about René Collier as well as the Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a neighborhood disagreement has evolved right into a extremely publicised legal fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than construction functions at the website on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a doctor and a company director respectively, look for to construct their spouse and children house. The case is now emblematic of wider disputes along Ireland’s coastline, where growth pressures collide with environmental protections as well as sensitivities of set up people. In accordance with the Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting produced by their potential neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted beneath setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those inhabitants of Dublin Road, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the phrases of their organizing authorization by building a wall past the boundaries in their web site, bringing about an encroachment on the Unique Location of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as a result spots are matter to strict controls below European and Irish environmental regulation. In their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even minimal encroachments might have Long lasting ecological repercussions, particularly in a very delicate coastal surroundings for instance Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny They are really in breach in their scheduling permission, and say the wall, which can be partly created, is in the proper position. Their authorized staff has characterised the motion as an try and hold off or frustrate a lawful progress. The pair accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding to be able to maintain their view, an allegation which has been repeated in court docket and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal preparing disputes, where by views of the sea are both equally very prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts with the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by ocean in storm to photograph the internet site, according to sworn evidence referenced inside the Irish Moments. In one account, Rene Collier waded via waistline-significant water throughout a storm to photograph the website Irish Instances, an image which has considering that grow to be emblematic in the intensity of the dispute. These steps weren't just symbolic; they have been meant to Acquire visual evidence of your wall’s position relative to tidal lines and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site from your sea Irish Periods reported, describing how the two Gentlemen entered the drinking water for the duration of significant weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm drinking water to photograph the internet site grew to become one of the most striking descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Situations write-up about accountant Paul Feely famous that this sort of steps had been cited to demonstrate the plaintiffs’ belief which the wall prolonged into a location impacted by tidal movement, strengthening their argument the SAC was getting encroached upon.
The occasions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being included in detail because of the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Occasions 27 Jan 2026 and Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 became greatly searched phrases as audience sought to know the track record and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court read further more submissions on whether or not interim orders need to be granted to halt development pending an entire hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical second inside the legal timeline.
With the core from the dispute can be a disagreement more than boundaries, planning compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely preserve the wall, as made, goes beyond what was accredited and intrudes into shielded land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has actually been described as meticulous in his evaluation of setting up paperwork, maps, and circumstances attached into the permission.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two pressured that their action is inspired by worry for environmental defense and adherence to setting up regulation. They reject promises that the situation is about preserving A non-public perspective, insisting alternatively that it's about ensuring that enhancement at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological boundaries. In affidavits, they may have described their lengthy-standing link to the realm as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the other aspect, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed them selves as a couple only endeavoring to create a loved ones house in accordance with the legislation. They deny that the wall encroaches on a Special Place of Conservation and say that all will work have been completed according to Qualified guidance and accepted strategies. Their legal professionals have argued the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, like getting into the sea in the course of a storm, do not alter the underlying info.
The situation has also raised broader questions about how planning disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute over development of wall at coastal web site happens to be a shorthand description for the situation a large number of observers see as significantly typical. As sea degrees rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning personal land, community foreshore, and guarded habitats is now much more contentious.
The Irish Moments report about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced previously been involved in local advocacy on setting up and environmental difficulties, nevertheless not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Times report about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how persons from really various Expert backgrounds can discover themselves aligned in these types of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Situations coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by way of waistline-large h2o through a storm to photograph the location Irish Moments and René Collier waded by way of waistline-significant water in the course of a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods are phrases that appeared continuously in coverage, reflecting each the Bodily truth on the coastline and the symbolic character in the act. For supporters of the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated dedication; for critics, they illustrated whatever they see as an too much method.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the outcome stays uncertain. The court should figure out whether the wall as developed complies with arranging permission and regardless of whether any encroachment into a Distinctive Space of Conservation has transpired. The legal arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and setting up conditions. Yet the human element remains central: neighbours who ought to Dwell alongside one another very long following the lawful charges are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing more than development functions at the internet site on Dublin Road, Sutton, nevertheless the implications of the situation increase past that deal with. For planners, developers, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the value of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal advancement. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary concerns which include environmental safety and house rights are perceived to be at stake.
Meanwhile, Sutton Strand remains a location of pure magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall at the centre from the dispute stands partially built, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal inquiries. Regardless of whether it will eventually be altered, eradicated, or completed as planned will depend on the court’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variants will possible proceed to look in headlines, connected indelibly to The most carefully viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin in recent years.